Am Samstag, den 03.02.2007, 17:52 -0500 schrieb Michel Salim: > 2007/2/3, Will Woods <wwoods@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 17:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > > I don't. More interestingly, is there value in having a test1 version instead > > > > of just defaulting to devel during the development process? We wind up with > > > > a ton of bugs in both anyway, why double our search efforts? What compelling > > > > reasons do we have for pooping out new versions to file bugs against for each > > > > test release, when we most likely want each bug reporter to update to latest > > > > rawhide and try it again? > > > > > > Requires manually shuffling the bugs to the final release later. > > > Other than that, no real issues. > > > > Yeah, it makes sense to me. I guess the weird part will be figuring out > > which of the 'devel' bugs are actually against F7 and which are from > > older releases. > > > How about filing bugs against 'devel' but adding a 'f7test1' keyword to it? > Why not add a "current stable" version, with a distro keyword for it? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
