Re: FC7T1 and Bugzilla product / version

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 14:53 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Saturday 03 February 2007 14:46, Bernd Bartmann wrote:
> > against which product and version bugs for FC7T1 should be filed? In
> > bugzilla.redhat.com one can find product "Fedora Core" and versions up
> > to "fc6", but no "fc7test1". Also, as there is no more "Fedora Core"
> > but only "Fedora" will the product then be "Fedora" and the version
> > "f7test1"? Anyway neither do exist yet.
> 
> This is an excellent question for Will to answer.  I think he gets the 
> pleasure of defining how we setup the bugzilla for our new Fedora.

Hah! Yes, I suppose that most exellent joy is mine.

So, we're keeping 'fc7' for the %dist tag (the .fc7 bit in package
names) because it would cause problems with RPM name sorting if we
changed that. But I don't think there's any tools that really require
the bugzilla version for Fedora [Core|Extras|whatever] to start with
'fc'. 

Can anyone see any other downside to using 'f7testX' instead of
'fc7testX'?

-w

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux