On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 11:12 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Mike McGrath (mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
> > redhat-lsb I might get rid of that. Does anyone here care about the
> > output from lsb_release?
>
> Realistically, for something like this, I'd track the distro release,
> and let the distro release <-> LSB release association be elsewhere.
You could always run lsb_release if it exists only (but it's pretty
pointless I guess).
Nils
--
Nils Philippsen / Red Hat / nphilipp@xxxxxxxxxx
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary
Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." -- B. Franklin, 1759
PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
