Mike McGrath (mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > redhat-lsb I might get rid of that. Does anyone here care about the > output from lsb_release? Realistically, for something like this, I'd track the distro release, and let the distro release <-> LSB release association be elsewhere. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list