Le Mer 17 janvier 2007 09:41, Thomas M Steenholdt a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> Le mardi 16 janvier 2007 à 23:26 +0100, Thomas M Steenholdt a écrit : >> >>> I've heard mention so many times, that it's a problem, people don't see >>> Fedora as a serious distribution for non-desktop/-testing use. I think >>> that this is exactly the problem. We want to be bleeding edge, but at >>> the same time it would be nice if an installed version could be trusted >>> to not break too often because of updates. >> >> In the Fedora space that means making updates safer¹, not finding ways >> to avoid updates. >> >> ¹ and supporting continuous yum updating with no anaconda stage >> >> > > Indeed. And I have no problem with things changing, as long as they keep > working. But let the updates flow for a longer period of time for a > branched version we could call Fedora LTS (or sumthin). Given the Fedora churn rate, I hope you realise that means you'll get a 85% new distro at about the time the Fedora new release happens, without the testing associated to a new release. With LTS you'll definitely get what amounts to a 100% new release without the testing -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
