On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 09:27 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 10:09 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Friday 05 January 2007 10:01, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > Personally, I'd rather see the current FESCo and Core cabal merged into > > > a single entity that shares both responsibilities. The Packaging > > > Committee would certainly still exist to come up with the packaging > > > guidelines, so that wouldn't change. And you immediately get community > > > involvement in the content of the release isos, which is what I think > > > Jessie meant by "hopefully there will be more than just me". Just my > > > $0.02. > > > > Keep in mind that it's just adding more people to a committee who may not care > > about other things such as sponsorship stuff, policy related to packages, > > various other stuff that FESCO current has to vote on. Its adding more > > people, making quorum harder to reach, especially when they might not have > > any interest/knowledge of whats being voted on. > > I said their responsibilities should be merged. I didn't say they > should necessarily be merged in in their current states. Actually, re-reading my own email I really did say "the current FESCo and Core cabal..". I meant the responsibilities though, not necessarily the actual committees themselves. Sorry for the confusion. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
