Jesse Keating schrieb: > On Friday 05 January 2007 10:01, Josh Boyer wrote: >> Personally, I'd rather see the current FESCo and Core cabal merged into >> a single entity that shares both responsibilities. The Packaging >> Committee would certainly still exist to come up with the packaging >> guidelines, so that wouldn't change. And you immediately get community >> involvement in the content of the release isos, which is what I think >> Jessie meant by "hopefully there will be more than just me". Just my >> $0.02. > Keep in mind that it's just adding more people to a committee who may not care > about other things such as sponsorship stuff, policy related to packages, > various other stuff that FESCO current has to vote on. Its adding more > people, making quorum harder to reach, especially when they might not have > any interest/knowledge of whats being voted on. Yeah, true, that problematic. > Personally I don't like a "commitee" for each little task that needs done. > I'm much more a fan of "hey these are the people doing the work, make sure > they talk to eachother, and report progress somewhere". [...] Yes, in an ideal world that should work. In a small Core-world it seems to have worked well, too. But I don't think it will work in a big community project... Just my 2 cent. Cu thl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
