On Friday 05 January 2007 01:55, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > This issue brings up a interesting question: Which board has the power > to influence and adjust this particular naming scheme in our new > "merged" world? FESCo or the Fedora Board? Ultimately I feel it should be the Fedora board. FESCo is really responsible for making sure the full repo is there, and the Distribution cabal (hopefully there will be more than just me) is responsible for taking content from that repository and creating installable iso sets from it. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpvttZhf8POn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
