On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 16:28 +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 10:09:52AM -0500, Saikat Guha wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 13:48 +0000, Leo wrote:
> > > Evolution is useless for most users now.
> >
> > On Fedora-devel, Evolution is responsible for 78% of the emails.
> > The next closest is Sylpheed with 9%
>
> Not all mailer use X-Mailer. Others use User-Agent. With the following:
> grep -h '^\(User-Agent\|X-Mailer\)' fedora-devel-list -r | awk '{print $2}' | sed 's;/.*;;' | sort | uniq -c | sort -n
>
>
> I get (for the mail saved in my fedora-devel-list mailbox, which may be biased):
>
> 1 AT&T
> 1 Mulberry
> 1 Null
> 1 SnapperMail
> 1 Wanderlust
> 2 Apple
> 2 http:
> 2 %p!0,0!
> 2 Pan
> 4 Loom
> 5 Balsa
> 5 Internet
> 7 VM
> 8 MH-E
> 10 Mail
> 16 KNode
> 16 Mew
> 20 SquirrelMail
> 23 Sylpheed-Claws
> 32 Gnus
> 43 Sylpheed
> 49 KMail
> 91 Ximian
> 134 Mozilla
> 148 Thunderbird
> 295 Mutt
> 330 Evolution
>
> There still seems to be about 200 mails not counted.
> Evolution is still first, but with a lower share. Maybe Ximian is also evolution,
> though. This is not very relevant, though, since mutt is second, this is
> certainly biased numbers.
Yes, since we are probably not considering a majority of users that used
Evo to get integrated into M$ networks, thus encroaching into M$
territory. Even taking your statements above into consideration, I did
a check on the kernel mailing list; Evo was number two right behind
Mutt.
--LX
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
