On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 04:14 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > On Wed, 2006-12-27 at 04:10 -0500, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 18:58 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 09:11 -0400, Dimi Paun wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 07:42 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > > > > > Evolution belongs in the bitbucket. > > > > > > > > Alan, > > > > > > > > This is pretty scary. Switching people off email clients like > > > > this is a big problem. People get really attached to their MUAs > > > > for lots of reasons, not in the least being that their mail > > > > archives can't be easily moved from client to client. > > > > > > > > Guys, Red Hat has been pushing Evo for a _long_ time now. It has > > > > to stay behind their choices, not force millions of users to switch > > > > at a drop of a hat (pun intended :)). > > > > > > > > This is a lot more serious than switching web browsers or other > > > > apps. Too many people will get affected, and rightfully pissed > > > > at RH. Silly excuses that you couldn't hire people to work on it > > > > will not fly. > > > > > > > > I'm really surprised that folks at RH throw around such scenarios > > > > without thinking a bit about consequences. How can enterprises trust > > > > you with any technological guidance/decision when you are willing to > > > > do things that would cost them untold millions without even blinking? > > > > > > You are over over-dramatizing. This is not a place for enterprises to > > > get technology guidance and nobody's personal opinions here is going to > > > cost anyone untold millions. > > > > > > > > > Rahul > > > > > > He's not over-dramatizing anything, he's telling the truth. Evo > > occupies a slot now, and it's stupid to throw it in the bitbucket. > > Period. > > > > LX > > > Forget any other posts that I send in this thread, there was a date > screwup on my system. Sorry about the confusion. > > LX > Isn't Evolution sort of, kind of, maintained by our fair friends over at Novell/Suse ? Does that have anything to do with this "Death to Evo" thread? The only over riding reason to _still_ use Evolution is to interface directly to a MS Exchange server. I happen to use it out of habit, not because it's better/worse. I perceive the mail filtering rules to be easier to configure and more robust than Thunderbird, but that may be _MY_ perception. Sean Sean -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
