On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 09:11 -0400, Dimi Paun wrote: > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 07:42 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > > Evolution belongs in the bitbucket. > > Alan, > > This is pretty scary. Switching people off email clients like > this is a big problem. People get really attached to their MUAs > for lots of reasons, not in the least being that their mail > archives can't be easily moved from client to client. > > Guys, Red Hat has been pushing Evo for a _long_ time now. It has > to stay behind their choices, not force millions of users to switch > at a drop of a hat (pun intended :)). > > This is a lot more serious than switching web browsers or other > apps. Too many people will get affected, and rightfully pissed > at RH. Silly excuses that you couldn't hire people to work on it > will not fly. > > I'm really surprised that folks at RH throw around such scenarios > without thinking a bit about consequences. How can enterprises trust > you with any technological guidance/decision when you are willing to > do things that would cost them untold millions without even blinking? You are over over-dramatizing. This is not a place for enterprises to get technology guidance and nobody's personal opinions here is going to cost anyone untold millions. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
