On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 15:08 +0200, Leszek Matok wrote: > It's the program that needs a maintainer, not the package (which is > actively maintained). No, the package is not actively maintained. Much more work could be done on it, including working with upstream. There is an upstream and they are accepting bugs, and supposedly working on them. Red Hat would love to pay someone to maintain our package and participate upstream in the program. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
