On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 07:42 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 10:15:20AM -0300, Pedro Fernandes Macedo wrote: > > However, moving evolution to extras may not be a good idea IMHO, > since evolution is the only tool (that I know of) that supports > Exchange servers. That is certainly an important feature for many > people in corporate environments (or people who use FC at home and > need evolution to use the work e-mail). > > Evolution in extras is a bad idea. Evolution in core is a worse idea. What > other as good as unmaintained large buggy package exposed to external attack > and with known unfixed DoS bugs (and probably worse yet to be found) do > we ship. > > Evolution belongs in the bitbucket. And what are you suggesting as a replacement ? If Evolution ends up in the bitbucket, something else with the same functionality should replace it. So what other Gnome email+calendar+addressbook+task management application should i use instead of evolution ? And why is evolution unmaintained? I mean it seems to be important enough that expensive commercial Linux distributions like RHEL use it as a default email client. - Erwin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
