Re: yum

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: yum
From: Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 00:22:51 +0000 (UTC)
References: <e1cfcb4a0612091319i2dbb7278s191082c5ba256432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <457C7678.60304@xxxxxxxxxx> <1165789771.13985.8.camel@xxxxxxxxxxx> <16de708d0612101608g11ab83es40f8c7dce79fd703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Arthur Pemberton <pemboa <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Besides, there is already Yumex, and KYum, right?

Right, and Synaptic (apt-based) and the Smart GUI.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- yum
  - From: Ahm ed
- Re: yum
  - From: Paul Michael Reilly
- Re: yum
  - From: nodata
- Re: yum
  - From: Arthur Pemberton

Prev by Date: Re: yum
Next by Date: Re: yum
Previous by thread: Re: yum
Next by thread: Re: yum
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux