Re: ideal config management framework [was: CPU Frequency Scaling]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthew Miller wrote:
Theoretically, I think gconf could actually support this if someone were
interested in writing the backend.


Of course that would still require a policy daemon to be running, which is one of the aspects I particularly do not like about the global registry based approach.

However - A framework that looks and works similar to gconf could be written based on this idea. Perhaps this was what you meant? The difference would be that such a framework would not require a policy daemon to be running.

/Thomas

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux