Re: ideal config management framework [was: CPU Frequency Scaling]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Davide Bolcioni wrote:

Personally, a scheme where (a) if the registry or policy daemon is not
operational it is supplemented by the configuration in /etc, and (b)
said configuration *overrides* unconditionally whatever the registry or
policy daemon spits out, would offer the right mix of safety and
functionality to give it a try on a non-production host, which seems the
sweet spot for Fedora. The scheme might get fancy and differentiate
between /etc/foo.conf which overrides unconditionally and
/etc/fallback/foo.conf which is read if the registry or policy daemon is
not available (and possibly overridden shortly thereafter).

If we must have a globally-universal configuration scheme, I'd prefer a libconfu (or such) library that can be used to reliably read, write and modify text based configuration files, keeping comments etc. within the files. Hand-configurations would be easy and well-supported and Apps/daemons could use the reading capabilities of the lib to read their config options. If somebody chose to create a frontend for app FOO, the read/write/modify capabilities of the lib could used to effectively and reliably implement that.

/Thomas

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux