Re: ideal config management framework [was: CPU Frequency Scaling]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thomas M Steenholdt wrote:

Still, if a new config system should make configging things easier, it would have to work all over the place. No apps should use other config-methods and *swoosh*, we're windows (in the worst possible sense). Not that I'm totally against adopting things that work fine on other OS's, but the windows registry is a notorious mess.

I think it's a mess for two reasons:
1. the information is structured in a highly non-intuitive way
2. the tools one can use to access and modify the registry are very primitive

Both are easy to avoid. E.g., Elektra does a reasonable job at avoiding reason #1.

http://elektra.sf.net/

Also - Think of the additional error scenarios when init is gconf'ed. The same complexity is added for everything else that adopts a registry based configuration engine (since that engine has to be operational for it to work in the first place) but may not be quite as aparrent.

A very small part of the system might make sense to stay out of the registry. init seems to me a likely candidate.

--
Florin Andrei

http://florin.myip.org/

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux