Re: Static linking considered harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Regardless, the object file/source distinction is meaningless anyway. 
> The object files encode ABI internals.  Those change and make object 
> file reuse impossible (we never guarantee compatibility of object files, 
> only executables and DSOs).  Therefore I argue that without distributing 
> sources people linking statically are always violating the license since 
> they don't allow relinking with later or earlier versions.

The LGPL doesn't talk about different versions; it only requires
relinking with modified copies of the same version that maintain
interface compatibility.

After all, even dynamic linking doesn't guarantee compatibility with
earlier versions.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux