On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:24:15PM +0300, Dmitry Butskoy wrote: > Alan Cox wrote: > > >Far simpler, cleaner and more friendly will be to dump the static > >libraries into libfoo-devel-static packages which are not in the > >default install. That ensures people who need to can do static > >links and the default behaviour is that they are not there. The > >-static packages could even get dropped off the CD easily enough > >once the mechanisms for handling one srpm spitting out binary > >components for extras and core are sorted > BTW, such a "-static" subpackages might be handled the same way as > "-debuginfo". Consider some example of needed rpm macros (attached > below), written one year ago when similar topic was discussed at > fedore-extras-devel list. That's very interesting, and one could perhaps even skip the need for explicitely invoking find_static in %install, but have that doen automatically dependent on presence of any *.a lib. E.g. w/o touching the specfiles at all. Very nice idea, Dmitry! -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgp0VespzLQ6s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
