Axel Thimm wrote: >> +1, although it would be a good idea to put the static libs in a >> seperate sub package. ( /me has no need for such a beast) > > Have you seen Dmitry Butskoy's post on this? He has created debuginfo > macros that automatically cater for that (packages are then named > foo-static, but that's tunable) w/o any changes in existing > specfiles. > Yeah I've seen that but I'm not sure if I like that, thats because I'm not sure if we should offer static libs for all packages or only for certain ones (like glibc, libstdc++, some standard X11 libs) Regards, Hans -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
