Ralf Corsepius wrote: > But, from an FE background, the situation is conversely: > People break ABIs/APIs/etc., > because they are not aware about doing so, Unfortunate, but could potentially be caught with education and updates-testing. > because they do not care about it, sad also, break out clue-stick. > because they blindly follow upstream > (and upstream doesn't care about ABI/API/etc.) I'd say maintainer's in a tough situation, if upstream neither cares, nor supports the older version, what to do? > because they think "having feature XXX outweighs ABI/API/etc.". Already addressed. Judgement call. -- Rex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list