On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 13:59 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote: > Rex is correct. We should look to avoid these situations if at all > possible. But sometimes, there is no good alternative. No disagreement ... if "there is no good alternative" ... I am not against breaking ABIs/APIs/etc. But, from an FE background, the situation is conversely: People break ABIs/APIs/etc., because they are not aware about doing so, because they do not care about it, because they blindly follow upstream (and upstream doesn't care about ABI/API/etc.) or because they think "having feature XXX outweighs ABI/API/etc.". Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
