Re: Core + Exrtas 2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2006-11-20 at 18:09 +0100, Leszek Matok wrote:
> Dnia 20-11-2006, pon o godzinie 09:12 -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie
> napisał(a):
> > Here's a proposal to consider:
> > 
> > "Official" packages for Fedora release X would consist of those packages
> > that exist in the development repository at the time that release X is
> > branched, (...)
> 
> > However, builds for new packages could be requested for non-development
> > branches.  The binary packages would go into the same yum repos as
> > official packages but would have "unofficial" status.
> What you propose would become the new Extras - there would be "official"
> and "unofficial" where currently there's "Core" and "Extras".

Kindof... it would mostly control what kind of updates could be applied
to a package in a release branch and which packages could be selected in
a CD/DVD compose and still be branded as "Fedora".

Jeff

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux