Dnia 20-11-2006, pon o godzinie 09:12 -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie napisał(a): > Here's a proposal to consider: > > "Official" packages for Fedora release X would consist of those packages > that exist in the development repository at the time that release X is > branched, (...) > However, builds for new packages could be requested for non-development > branches. The binary packages would go into the same yum repos as > official packages but would have "unofficial" status. What you propose would become the new Extras - there would be "official" and "unofficial" where currently there's "Core" and "Extras". There's no reason to ban inclusion of e.g. a new game to the repositories UNLESS it's not obsoleting something already in. So I'm for a policy: - update to new versions of existing packages if there are serious reasons (severe bugs, security fixes), - add new packages provided they don't get installed automatically on users' computers. Lam
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: To jest =?UTF-8?Q?cz=C4=99=C5=9B=C4=87?= listu podpisana cyfrowo
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
