On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 10:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 16:31 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote: > > > >>> > >> There are also problems with the code quality, or lack thereof. It's > >> dissected somewhere else in the thread. > > > > If we're not going to let packages in based on code quality "standards" > > then we're going to be kicking out a lot packages I think. > > What is going to be default generally has higher standards applied to > them. There already is a lot of packages discouraged for their code > quality. I know atleast phpbb and webmin were put up for review and left > off in the middle when people pointed out their security history and > need for constant vigilance. > There's a sharp distinction between: riddled with security holes and "code is not pretty enough" -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
