Re: Testing Fedora - small (?) suggestion.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sunday 12 November 2006 07:18, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> This is the typical  discuss-things-endlessly-before-even-trying  type of
> conversation. Meanwhile, the "Package EVR problems in FC+FE" report [1]
> gets longer (even ".FC6" dist tags pop up in there - what the heck?!), and
> Extras packagers don't rebuild their devel packages either. Even if they
> managed to do so with a time-consuming mock build, they could not update
> their rawhide machines (or upgrade FC6 to rawhide) without trying to hack a
> long list of excludes.

And extras people can't rebuild against packages that don't get published.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Release Engineer: Fedora

Attachment: pgp4tvwpZPeCi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux