On Sat, 2006-11-11 at 16:31 -0500, Christopher Aillon wrote: > n0dalus wrote: > > On 11/11/06, Christopher Aillon <caillon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Tracker has been proposed[1] to be included into GNOME and has been > >> rejected for various reasons. See the thread for full details, but > >> Joe's reply[2] lists some good reasons to not include tracker at this > >> time. > >> > >> [1]http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-October/msg00175.html > >> > >> [2]http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel-list/2006-October/msg00211.html > >> > >> > > > > His main complaint seems to be that tracker hasn't had a lot of > > testing. Maybe Fedora can help in that respect by putting it in devel > > and getting the community using it. > > > > n0dalus. > > > > There are also problems with the code quality, or lack thereof. It's > dissected somewhere else in the thread. If we're not going to let packages in based on code quality "standards" then we're going to be kicking out a lot packages I think. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
