This thread is just highlighting the problems with using extensions to disambiguate file-types.
No it's not. This thread is primarily highlighting the fact that SHA1SUM files, which relate to a specific FC version and arch, should be named accordingly. This IMO is a very good idea, because the name "SHA1SUM" is meaningless when you have several different ISOs lying around. The ISO file itself is named according to the FC version number and arch. We don't simply call it "ISO". -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
