On Monday 30 October 2006 08:53, Keith G wrote: > No it's not. This thread is primarily highlighting the fact that > SHA1SUM files, which relate to a specific FC version and arch, should > be named accordingly. This IMO is a very good idea, because the name > "SHA1SUM" is meaningless when you have several different ISOs lying > around. The ISO file itself is named according to the FC version > number and arch. We don't simply call it "ISO". /me points to boot.iso, vmlinuz, initrd.img, diskboot.img, RELEASE-NOTES.txt, and any number of other generic named files. Many of these files have generic names because they are meant to live within a specific directory structure. SHA1SUM being one of them. You can easily reference the same file across all releases to get the information. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgp7kuBitqwGh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
