On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 19:21 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Sat, 2006-09-02 at 23:13 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > The criteria for it, however, is that it can NEVER happen automatically. > There will be no config option that sets it to happen it will only be > something one does on the command line (and maybe it should implicitly > disable -y) > > Seriously, I'd like it to be something that requires hoops, maybe even > flaming hoops. :) Please keep '-y' as it stands otherwise it ceases to be scriptable and therefore becomes less helpful than "rpm -e $PKG && yum -y install $PKG-version". I see the point being made on the list that there is a chance that an RPM could have a %postun scripts that breaks things, but by the same token the damaged RPM could have poor logic in the %pre, %post, %verify, etc etc areas. It's not the package managers job to stop poorly produced RPMs from breaking things. If an RPM is going to break then it's going to break, and we'll always have the old faithful "rpm -e" anyway. Granted it's probably more useful for rawhide users than Core users but even so I can still see it being of use to users who are somewhat less skilled in the black arts of RPM commands and simply want a way to revert a kernel or xorg package that shipped with a busted driver. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
