On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 02:24:52PM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 14:18 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Jindrich Novy (jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > > > The only GTK+ xdvi alternative I'm aware of is gtkdvi: > > > http://www.nada.kth.se/~johannes/gtkdvi/ > > > > > > But I haven't tried it yet. Hopefully it could solve the openmotif/Xaw > > > dependency hell in teTeX, so that libXaw could be moved to Extras as > > > well. > > > > How hard would it be to do dvi reading in Evince or similar? > > > > Evince has a dvi backend, but it is not up to par with xdvi, and not > included in the current evince package. kdvi isn't too bad but kde is moving to extras... Most of the users that I support don't really use a dvi viewer anyway, it's almost always dvips and gv afterwards (for some reason they *hate* evince). So, is a dvi viewer needed in core? Kostas -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
