Jindrich Novy (jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > Jindrich Novy wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 13:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > >> Joachim Frieben wrote: > > >>> The "tetex-xdvi" package is missing from the list below. Of course, building > > >>> against "Openmotif" has always been optional. One would have to revert to > > >>> the "X/Athena" widget based interface in order to keep it in "core". > > >>> I suppose, moving "tetex" (or its successor) to "extras" was not part of the > > >>> agenda ... > > >> In the longer term I would very much like to move libXaw (and Xaw3d) to > > >> extras as well. > > > > > > So I hope teTeX will be in Extras as well in that time, because the only > > > remaining Athena - libXaw alternative: neXtaw is not in Core but in > > > Extras already. > > > > That would be a prerequisite for removing Xaw from Core, yes. I admit > > unfamiliarity with the TeX stack; is there a viable gtk replacement for > > teTeX? > > The only GTK+ xdvi alternative I'm aware of is gtkdvi: > http://www.nada.kth.se/~johannes/gtkdvi/ > > But I haven't tried it yet. Hopefully it could solve the openmotif/Xaw > dependency hell in teTeX, so that libXaw could be moved to Extras as > well. How hard would it be to do dvi reading in Evince or similar? Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
