On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 14:18 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jindrich Novy (jnovy@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 13:55 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > Jindrich Novy wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 13:27 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > >> Joachim Frieben wrote: > > > >>> The "tetex-xdvi" package is missing from the list below. Of course, building > > > >>> against "Openmotif" has always been optional. One would have to revert to > > > >>> the "X/Athena" widget based interface in order to keep it in "core". > > > >>> I suppose, moving "tetex" (or its successor) to "extras" was not part of the > > > >>> agenda ... > > > >> In the longer term I would very much like to move libXaw (and Xaw3d) to > > > >> extras as well. > > > > > > > > So I hope teTeX will be in Extras as well in that time, because the only > > > > remaining Athena - libXaw alternative: neXtaw is not in Core but in > > > > Extras already. > > > > > > That would be a prerequisite for removing Xaw from Core, yes. I admit > > > unfamiliarity with the TeX stack; is there a viable gtk replacement for > > > teTeX? > > > > The only GTK+ xdvi alternative I'm aware of is gtkdvi: > > http://www.nada.kth.se/~johannes/gtkdvi/ > > > > But I haven't tried it yet. Hopefully it could solve the openmotif/Xaw > > dependency hell in teTeX, so that libXaw could be moved to Extras as > > well. > > How hard would it be to do dvi reading in Evince or similar? > Evince has a dvi backend, but it is not up to par with xdvi, and not included in the current evince package. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
