On Friday 28 July 2006 16:16, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Friday 28 July 2006 04:13, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I keep hearing this argument, that the packages for the involved drivers > > can be made to conflict with the update. Which in essence will deprive > > all but the most technical of our users from security updates. So this > > is a moot argument. ? Deprive all but the most technical of our users > > from security updates is almost as bad as completly breaking their > > system. > > So you'd rather we hold the update for EVERYBODY so that EVERYBODY gets > denied the update? yeah, that's progress... If I extend your idea, FC-5 should exactly the same as FC-devel. A major release of FC should avoid breaking things. The ABI-breaking updates should be reserved for FC-devel and next major release (in that case FC-6). -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
