Re: Fedora's intended target audience?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Steven Pritchard wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2006 at 09:23:11AM -0700, David Boles wrote:

Steven Pritchard wrote:

Maybe you should file a bug with the other repo to make their ATI and
Nvidia drivers conflict with xorg-x11-$something >= 7.0.  Then the
upgrade should get held until after the drivers have been fixed.

I hope that comment was meant to be funny.


I think you misunderstood.  I meant make the packages conflict at the
rpm level.  (It's a simple matter of putting the right Requires: or
Conflicts: line(s) in the spec.)  That way yum wouldn't try to upgrade
xorg until the driver package was upgraded.

Yes i think this is the best solution for nvidia.ko users. Use the livna package and rely on an explicit versioned Requires:. This will act as a "reminder" to add the proper --excludes if you try to run a 'yum -y update' during an uncaffeinated morning. Now I guess we just need new maintainer for the livna package...

-denis

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux