Tomasz Kłoczko (kloczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > Dnia 24-05-2006, śro o godzinie 12:37 -0400, Bill Nottingham napisał(a): > [..] > > It was linked statically. Static glib libs went away, so.... > > OK. Next round .. why have (literaly) *one* binary (ppp-watch) which > uses now shared libglib must affect glib ? > Is not better rewrite this tool for not use glib ? or what so big > performs ppp-watch where using glib is neccessary ? is it realy so hard > rewrite this for not use glib ? How does glib in /lib change things in a bad way? (Realistically, by having it shared in PAM, etc., it saves memory....) This also enables using other things earlier in the boot process, such as d-bus, hal, NM, etc. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
