Re: rawhide report: 20060524 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dnia 24-05-2006, śro o godzinie 12:37 -0400, Bill Nottingham napisał(a):
[..]
> It was linked statically. Static glib libs went away, so....

OK. Next round .. why have (literaly) *one* binary (ppp-watch) which
uses now shared libglib must affect glib ?
Is not better rewrite this tool for not use glib ? or what so big
performs ppp-watch where using glib is neccessary ? is it realy so hard
rewrite this for not use glib ?

kloczek
PS. remember: fixing some bad things by introduce some way less ass pain
way is *most* worse way of development :>
Better is rest this kind things in current form and add them to TODO
list.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux