On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 18:41 +0200, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote: > Dnia 24-05-2006, śro o godzinie 12:15 -0400, Bill Nottingham napisał(a): > > Tomasz Kłoczko (kloczek@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Dnia 24-05-2006, śro o godzinie 03:54 -0400, Build System napisał(a): > > > [..] > > > > fribidi-0.10.7-3 > > > > ---------------- > > > > * Tue May 23 2006 Caolan McNamara <caolanm@xxxxxxxxxx> 0.10.7-3 > > > > - rh#192669# clearly I didn't actually get around to basing fribidi-config > > > > of pkg-config output > > > > > > Instead fixing all <foo>-config scripts better will be remove them all > > > and move all <foo> lib detections to use pkgconfig. > > > This allow strip down entrophy on this area instead enlarging .. > > > > That would require patching all *upstream* users of library <foo> > > to change their configury, which could involve redoing all of their > > auto* files. It's not a 'small' amount of work. > > And what is so problematic in make this as "this feacture will be > disscontinued in FC6 ?" It would mean implementing a Fedora proprietary breakage of package's API - This can't be in Fedora's interest. Ralf -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
