2006/5/23, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>:
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 12:54 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Just curious what the targeted general schedule is, what FC6's > concrete schedule is (e.g. if the general schedule is 9 month, why go > 6 months for FC6?), and closely related to this, what the relationship > RHEL5 to FC5/FC6 will be. FC5's 9(10, 11) month schedule was an experiment in adjusting the schedule to see if it helped in our release. While it did allow for some larger changes to make it through, it multiplied the amount of little changes at the same time. It created a very bad situation for those of us trying to do any kind of QA on the distro before it went out the door. For all those involved, we felt that the 9 month schedule hurt more than it helped and we're back to the tried and true 6 month schedule, with slips here and there (hopefully not). Sorry for the confusion. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEcvZm4v2HLvE71NURAlcGAJ4mgNB7n2Z8t9S0q4fkMtBH4VDaCQCfU9O0 ssY1dr9GZAVYIFM0DxXe6ZI= =cmkJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
just like with any other project: release early, release often :)) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
