On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 14:42 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On Wed, 2006-05-24 at 11:06 +0200, Hans Kristian Rosbach wrote: > > > But I am glad to see that I have helped some people. > > > > I am considering making respins for FC5 aswell, but with the lack of > > cooperation from fedora or community members it's currently on hold. > > There is both actually. Fedora Unity project seems to be already > producing respins. > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006- > May/msg00186.html > https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-advisory-board/2006- > May/msg00251.html Yes, so they claim. However I have not been able to locate much info about these isos. I also don't know whether they use the official FC5 anaconda rpm (with its bugs) or their own rebuild of it. And if it is a "private" rebuild, I just don't like the idea as it raises a lot of concerns. Oh, and I'll have to correct my previous statement. I met a lot of cooperation from Rahul, and I am very thankful for that. Unfortunately we could not resolve the problems (see previous threads) by ourself. I will most likely make private respins for use in-house, just like what we had planned the FC4 ones to be. We have a pretty strict policy about knowing the origins and details of packages. -HK -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
