Re: rawhide report: 20060509 changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 16:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> >   
> >> Is there any point in posting patches for old packages? 
> >>     
> >
> > I don't follow the question...
> >   
> There are some packages (mostly X stuff) with self referential descriptions:
> 
>   libXmu - "X.Org X11 libXmu/libXmuu runtime libraries"
>   libsilc - "SILC Client Library libraries for SILC client" (4 unique 
> words in a 7-word sentence :)
>   perl-Tree-Simple - "A simple tree object."
> 
> There aren't many (less than I remembered) so the situation is not bad.

If you are planning to provide patches to fix these descriptions better,
go ahead. Might also add fedora-package-review list to the bug report CC
list.

Rahul

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux