On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 11:45 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > This is not very descriptive. Are there any guidelines for > descriptions? > (it's a bit disappointing to find that guidelines are necessary for > this). This seems to have been included accidentally. It was supposed to be built for the OLPC project, but was not quite ready yet (hadn't been reviewed or anything) for rawhide. I'm investigating what happened. > Is there any point in posting patches for old packages? I don't follow the question... -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
