Re: License question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 09:37:19AM +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 09:25:04AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> > IANAL, but I agree. If you think this groupware is worth it, I would say
> > try to find others who agree (the Debian packager for a start) build a
> > small team and fork it. Don't forget to make much noise about the fork
> > on every Linux related site (send out a press release) so that you can
> > quickly build a _real_ community.
> 
> Don't underestimate the work, especially as the package is not a
> "clean" piece of software already, it does not work yet with GCJ
> (if I understood Erwin correctly), etc.

Erwin has patches for the previous version that make it work with GCJ.

  http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2006-February/msg00924.html

> For that you really need a very motivated team and I think it's
> worth first investigating of OGo is really not worth a try.

OGo was in pretty sorry shape a few months ago when I last tried it.

Steve
-- 
Steven Pritchard - K&S Pritchard Enterprises, Inc.
Email: steve@xxxxxxxxx             http://www.kspei.com/
Phone: (618)398-3000               Mobile: (618)567-7320

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux