Re: License question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Jos Vos wrote:
> On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote:
> 
>> <meta name="DC.Relation" content="http://www.open-xchange.org";>
>> <meta name="DC.Creator" content="Netline Internet Service GmbH">
>> <meta name="DC.Rights" content="(c) Netline Internet Service GmbH. All
>> rights reserved.">
>>
>> IANAL so I can not judge if those "tags" would overrule the general
>> COPYING file that mentioned the GPL, or if the COPYING (and also the
>> license information of the website, which is now updated btw) would
>> overrule those tags.
> 
> If a license was included for the whole package, without mentioned
> exceptions, these copyright statements won't change that.  Copyright
> and license are in fact different things.
> 

IANAL, but I agree. If you think this groupware is worth it, I would say
try to find others who agree (the Debian packager for a start) build a
small team and fork it. Don't forget to make much noise about the fork
on every Linux related site (send out a press release) so that you can
quickly build a _real_ community.

Regards,

Hans

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux