On Sat, May 06, 2006 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > <meta name="DC.Relation" content="http://www.open-xchange.org";> > <meta name="DC.Creator" content="Netline Internet Service GmbH"> > <meta name="DC.Rights" content="(c) Netline Internet Service GmbH. All > rights reserved."> > > IANAL so I can not judge if those "tags" would overrule the general > COPYING file that mentioned the GPL, or if the COPYING (and also the > license information of the website, which is now updated btw) would > overrule those tags. If a license was included for the whole package, without mentioned exceptions, these copyright statements won't change that. Copyright and license are in fact different things. > Of course they could just have removed those tags and have the GPL "take > over" via the COPYING file. But they didn't and until now they didn't > really give an explanation why they didn't, the answer to that question > was; In fact, IMHO you better should put such copyright statements in every file, to protect it as much as possible. That you then license everything under the GPL is fine. > - The community ask for this (i do not mean the community you > see here on the list - but you maybe can imagine that there > are other communities behind Open-Xchange - not visible on the > very first view) They probably mean the commercial user community? -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
