On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 09:49 -0400, Dimi Paun wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2006 9:04 am, Jos Vos wrote: > > It's difficult to judge what package "the leading" groupware will be > > (if any), but until now I'd put my coins on OGo. I have only globally > > compared all the options (including suites like Horde etc.), but all > > options are either a complex mess (and extremely difficult to package) > > or they lack functionality or a big community (or both). > > Speaking of Exchange alternatives, how about things like: > * http://zimbra.com/ > * http://www.egroupware.org/ > * http://www.citadel.org/ > * http://www.exchange4linux.org/ > * http://hula-project.org/ > > In particular Zimbra, it looks very good. Do people have any > experience with any of these? Zimbra also has most of its interesting features in the closed source version only http://zimbra.com/products/product_editions.html . Like Jos mentioned most groupwares are an interesting mix of Free and closed source things, where the "nice" features are in the closed source version. - Erwin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
