On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 14:19 +0200, Jos Vos wrote: > On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 01:59:29PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote: > > > In the case of Open-Xchange we are talking about ~3.5MB of pictures and > > HTML code, which is tightly coupled to java backend code (that is > > GPLed). So rewriting the frontend is just a waste of time and writing a > > new groupware would probably be faster (especially since there still has > > to be done a lot of work to make it compile with GCJ). > > Referring to "writing a new groupware": what about putting the work > in getting OpenGroupware.org suitable for Fedora? AFAIK OGo is > licensed as GPL (and partly as LGPL). Unfortunately, OGo is w.r.t. > packaging a real mess (last time I looked I saw that binary packages > existed that had no source packages). That is pretty much just a matter of taste, I really like the look and feel of Open-Xchange, especially the webmail part (which i dislike in OGo). But if it is really impossible to add Open-Xchange than, yes I will rather spend my time on OGo. - Erwin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
