Re: License question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 01:59:29PM +0200, Erwin Rol wrote:

> In the case of Open-Xchange we are talking about ~3.5MB of pictures and
> HTML code, which is tightly coupled to java backend code (that is
> GPLed). So rewriting the frontend is just a waste of time and writing a
> new groupware would probably be faster (especially since there still has
> to be done a lot of work to make it compile with GCJ).

Referring to "writing a new groupware": what about putting the work
in getting OpenGroupware.org suitable for Fedora?  AFAIK OGo is
licensed as GPL (and partly as LGPL).  Unfortunately, OGo is w.r.t.
packaging a real mess (last time I looked I saw that binary packages
existed that had no source packages).

-- 
--    Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx>
--    X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV   |   Phone: +31 20 6938364
--    Amsterdam, The Netherlands        |     Fax: +31 20 6948204

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux