Re: Why Elektra is the wrong approach (Was Re: The Strengths and Weakness of Fedora/RHEL OS management)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le mardi 04 avril 2006 à 12:25 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 18:11 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

> > Would it have been so hard to include a server component from the start
> > when people gave you early warnings instead of bolting it in as an
> > afterthought ?
> 
> Uhm, no one is forcing you to use NetworkManager just yet so there is
> not really any regression.

Which is why people complaining so far are few.

>  Btw, the price we pay to support two
> networking configuration stacks is higher than you think.

Probably.
But no one advocated two config stacks - just one that took care of the
whole problem-space (which includes the no-gui-nor-user-logged-in,
many-users-logged-in, gui-user, tui-over-ssh-user)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux