Nicholas Miell wrote:
On Sun, 2006-04-02 at 08:28 +0200, dragoran wrote:
I have noticed that when I have package foo-1.0.i386 installed and some
other (x86_64) repo has foo-1.1.x86_64 yum updates foo and removes the
i386 one.
(livna mplayerplug-in was it here).
Updates should not be crossarch a i386 package should only be updated to
a i386 one (same for x86_64).
Any reason for doing this? Or is this a bug thats needs to be filled?
And when OpenOffice finally gets a working AMD64 version, I fully expect
the AMD64 packages to replace the i386 packages when I do a yum update.
Packaging is hard; let's go shopping!
thats a special case...
but updating crossarch without even tell the user may break working
setups very easy
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
